Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Indian J Cancer ; 48(1): 34-9, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21248448

ABSTRACT

AIM: Esophageal cancer remains a major and lethal health problem. In Nepal, not much has been explored about its management. The aim of this study was to conduct a retrospective review of esophageal cancer patients undergoing surgery or combined modality treatment at a cancer hospital in Nepal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Resectable cases were treated primarily with surgery. Locally advanced cases with doubtful or obviously unresectability underwent preoperative chemo/radiation or chemoradiation followed by surgery. RESULTS: Among 900 patients, 103 were treated with curative intent. Mean age of patients was 54 years, and 100% of the patients presented with complaint of dysphagia. Surgery as a single modality of treatment was done in 57% of cases, and the remaining underwent combined modality treatment. Transthoracic and transhiatal approaches were used in 95% and 5% of cases, respectively. Nodal sampling, two-field (2-FD), and three-field lymphadenectomy (3-FD) were done in 18%, 59%, and 20% of cases, respectively. A majority of patients had pathological stage III disease (46.6%). In-hospitality mortality was 5%, and anastomotic leakage rate was 14%. In 87% of patients, R0 resection was achieved. Overall, 4-year survival was 20%. A R0 resection, early-stage disease and 3-FD favored the survival advantage (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The mortality, complication, and survival results were in the acceptable range. R0 resection and radical nodal dissection should be standard practice.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy , Postoperative Complications , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...